“Within 2-3 days the Board rejected her request. When DPS issued a notice of denial, Starr applied to the Fingerprinting Board for a good cause exception. That job did not require a clearance card, but in 2017 Starr applied with DPS for a clearance card in order to enter a nursing program. She also did volunteer work before taking a job in 2015 helping other addicts in their recovery. Around 2011, she began what he her attorney calls a “long pilgrimage to rehabilitation.” Those efforts included college, where Starr focused on substance abuse and addition. “Despite the fact that DPS made the decision that Starr disagrees with, Starr chose to sue the Board and not to sue DPS.”Ĭourt records show Starr was a drug addict for more than 30 years during which she spent time in jail and prison. “While the Board and DPS both play a role in the fingerprint clearance card application process, different enabling statutes govern each agency and each agency operates and is funded separately from the other,” the attorney general argued. But such a challenge would not involve the Board of Fingerprinting, as “there is no legal mechanism that allows the Board to sit as an appellate body reviewing, much less changing or reversing, any DPS decision,” including the classification of an out-of-state conviction. The attorney general’s office admits there is no state law or DPS rule establishing a method for administratively challenging DPS’s classification of an out-of-state conviction. “Not having a card will bar one from working in more than 50 different jobs and professions.”
“Today, one cannot over-exaggerate the need of having a fingerprint card if you intend to work with people,” Starr’s appeal argues. The Board could not surrender its independent decision-making to a DPS employee making “a split second decision,” she argued. The Board of Fingerprinting, Starr argued, had a legal obligation to ensure the DPS clerk “made the correct call” in determining the equivalency or classification of her Texas offense under Arizona’s criminal statutes. However, she argued to the Arizona Board of Fingerprinting that the Texas conviction was more equivalent to Arizona’s child neglect or endangerment statute, a much lower felony which made Starr eligible to apply for a good cause exemption. Such a crime put Starr in the absolutely barred category with murderers and rapists. Starr was denied a clearance card after a DPS employee labeled her 2002 conviction in Texas for “Abandoning or Endangering Child” as being equivalent to a high level felony of child abuse in Arizona. Starr applied for in 2019 to work as a Behavioral Health Technician. The second, referred to as a Standard Card, is the type Sandra K. The first, called a Level 1 Card, is harder to get. Serving the Arizona communities of Phoenix, Scottsdale, Peoria, Paradise Valley, Glendale, Gilbert, Tempe, Mesa, Chandler, Goodyear, Surprise, Higely, El Mirage, Tolleson, Apache Junction, Queen Creek, Maricopa, Avondale, Buckeye, San Tan Valley, Gold Canyon, Sun Lakes, Sun City West, Litchfield Park, Carefree, Cave Creek, Fountain Hills, Guadalupe, Casa Grande, Coolidge, Florence, Gila Bend, Kearny, Wickenburg, Superior, Youngtown.And while the Arizona Court of Appeals is set to weigh in on that problem for one 2019 applicant, the attorney general contends the applicant took the wrong state agency to court.Īrizona offers two types of fingerprint clearance cards.
Reopen on Tuesday September 6, 10am - 6pmįingerprinting from $14, TB Test $30. Use Google Maps for best results.ĬLOSED MONDAY SEPTEMIN OBSERVANCE OF LABOR DAY Temporary Office Relocation to San Tan Village Mallĭue to our building fire in 2021, we have relocated to the offices above San Tan Mall (above Francesca's) 2200 E Williams Field Rd, Suite 200 - Door#17 - Gilbert, AZ 85295 - Enter through the doors between Francesca's and Madison Reed.
#Arizona fingerprint card skin#
TB Skin Test $40 (Read included)-Call today to schedule an appointment AZ Clearance Cards (Reg or IVP), Childcare, Nursing, Real Estate, etc.
0 kommentar(er)
